The curious case of American Express vs. The Mayor

KNL-CV09-5013552-S - AMERICAN EXPRESS CEN v. HYSLOP, WADE
Well it did not make the judicial website in time to be news worthy for the time before the beating that the Democrats got in the November 3rd elections but it is out there now. Thanks to a “Day” poster this information was in the comments section for a short period. But complaints from what appears to be avid and confused supporters of the current mayor resulted in the “Day” removing the post but not before I happened across it. In cases like this the facts are pretty clear. A charge card balance goes unpaid for a period of time. The creditor makes attempts to collect. The card holder has the opportunity to respond and explain, dispute or pay the bill. In cases where the bill remains unpaid the efforts on the part of the creditor are beefed up. Under Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act billing amounts in dispute cannot be reported against the credit history of the card holder and legal actions cannot be started. What exists is an environment where the opportunities are present for either party to resolve the matter. If the matter remains unresolved the Court System is the next available venue to attempt resolution. So here is a case of an unpaid bill that one can conclude is sizable. One can conclude that all reasonable attempts to collect or resolve any misunderstanding by either party have failed. The docket indicates no response from the defendant in this matter. See for yourself at the State Judicial website. http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/PartySearch.aspx this site allows you to input a name and it will display results of any cases pertaining to the individual. The following is the result with the Mayor’s name http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/CaseDetail/PublicCaseDetail.aspx?DocketNo=KNLCV095013552S. These are the facts these are not slanderous statements. Why the “DAY” would remove the post is beyond my comprehension.